Recently there was a brouhaha over at Derfwad Manor—I can’t link to it because Mrs. G. shut it down right away; the commotion was only tangentially linked to the post she’d written and spiraled out of control in quite an ugly way. One person actually used the “n” word in the comments and my head is still reeling over the fact that a) anybody would use that word and b )anybody would use that word at Derfward Manor.
The gist of the whole thing is that Mrs. G. was sharing a podcast on poverty she’d heard and one commenter, a teacher—let’s say Commenter A, wrote about how hard it is to watch parents make terrible choices about money that impacts their children negatively. Because she mentioned hair weaves, the comment seemed racially-tinged. Another commenter, Commenter B, called her (and the horrid person that used the “n” word) out and things deteriorated from there.
This is the thing.
I know both A and B. I really like them both—okay, I might sort of love B a little in a “how did I ever cross paths with someone so much cooler than I am” kind of way--and I think they are both good-hearted people who care deeply about children and education. I can see why B took what A said the way she did, but I can still sort of understand why A said it—though, in retrospect, I’m sure she wishes she would have phrased things quite differently.
(I have so been there and it was so not fun.)
I understand about generational poverty. I understand about a permanent underclass. I understand about racism. I understand that there are sociological and psychological reasons behind the choices all of us make. I am positive white privilege exists. These are things I understand intellectually and they provide the framework in which I attempt to view various situations; especially as this relates to students with whom I work.
I also understand that a teacher who sees the promise and hope a child has being undermined at every turn by parental choices that run counter to her own values (stress on “own values”—what makes us positive our values are the “right” ones?) can easily become very frustrated. Frustrated enough to dash off a comment that makes her look/sound “racist.”
I think the part of the equation that cannot be ignored right now is the climate in which teachers are teaching. Teachers are being blamed for all the shortcomings in our educational system today and that’s not fair. Even the best teacher in the world cannot overcome a class full of children that are not properly nourished, properly rested, adequately supplied and whose parent(s) support their education with access to books, study time, etc. (This doesn’t even scratch the surface of the systemic clusterf**k that is our currently educational system.)
I am not saying I blame the parents for all of this (see paragraph 6), but I am also saying I don’t blame the teachers (okay, I do blame some of the bad teachers I encounter, but that’s a separate post).
As far as the brouhaha that started this post goes, it is sad to know that two people who would likely get along really well if they ever met "in real life" have such terrible opinions of one another.
Last week's post, Point/Counterpoint, generated some interesting comments--and some of you HAD seen the post before it was pulled. Aunt Snow's comment was so spot-on that I want to highlight it.
I commented early in the life of that post, then went back to see the traffic and it was gone.
I think the credibility of the main point that A made - that poor parenting choices affect the ability of their kids to learn - was damaged by A's use of cultural stereotypes to characterize the parents. The point that some parents selfishly place their own personal priorities over those of their kids' best interest is an issue for generational poverty in all cultures.
Another thing too often overlooked is that this parental selfishness is not limited to poor people. A parent who indulges in personal grooming but neglects their kid's diet? Plenty of examples of that in affluent homes. The kids may not be starving, but they may be stuffed with fast food instead of nutritional food.
It was a useful discussion marred by the discourse of bigotry - whether that bigotry was intended or not.
She is so right--parents from all cultures and of all socioeconomic statuses sometimes make choices that are not in a child's best interests.
The lesson from this is not that we shouldn't have these discussions--we must have these discussions, but we need to be aware of our language and our own biases at all times. Acknowledging our biases is as important step in self-awareness, I think. All of us--by virtue of being imperfect human beings and human nature being what it is--have biases, but the more we explore them and the reasons behind them, the better we can deal with them.
To that end, I urge you to check out Project Implicit. This project uses scientific techniques to help us uncover the messages our subconscious is giving us when it comes to matters of bias. It's truly fascinating. If you have a bit of time to noodle around on it, I would love to hear what you think. It's been an eye-opener for me, for sure.
Also, LeahPeah just did an interview with Mocha Momma that is worth reading if you, like me, are eager to be part of the conversation.