I've already sent out my Christmas cards and letter, so it's too late to edit the letter to include, "On December 17, 2008 Danger Boy became the first member of the family ever to get suspended from school." Oh well, maybe next year.
Herein lies the quandary. When a student is involved in a fight the school has no choice but to suspend the student. Even when said student didn't start the fight and was only defending himself. Sure, they can lower the punishment from a 3 to 1 day suspension and make the phone call home to the mom sound more like a call to offer congratulations on the student's politeness and cooperation and exemplary record up to this point rather than one to report a serious infraction. So (quandary) what are the parents supposed to do? Punish him for fighting/defending himself? Let the school do what they must do without comment? Fight to have the suspension remover from his permanent record in case it affects his college choices? We're leaning toward the middle option.
As there's always a silver lining; this one is the rousing defense Social Butterfly made on her brother's behalf and how she railed against the inequity of the system and the fact that she started crying when someone told her that her brother had been in a fight and was bleeding. Sibling love may not manifest itself outwardly on a daily basis, but it's nice to know it's there.
I'm going to shut down the computer now and sing Kum Ba Ya with my family.
go sing with the fam now.
and this is such a hard one. I'm glad I'm not the administrator because from a "policy" point of view, I can see the pros and cons. Grrr.
Posted by: CC | December 18, 2008 at 01:11 AM
Bummer. I'd go with the middle option too. The sibling solidarity is icing.
Posted by: mrs. g. | December 18, 2008 at 02:24 AM
We have been here too. Our school don't suspend for a fight unless it is an unprovoked or vicious incident- they just put it down to too much testosterone, and boys clashing antlers.
The kids are read the riot act, but privately the teachers and parents roll their eyes.
I blame too much WWE personally. When teenager was younger we had to ban it!
Posted by: lakeland Jo | December 18, 2008 at 03:18 AM
I'm so sorry. I would go with the middle option.
Posted by: Mary Alice | December 18, 2008 at 05:21 AM
oh goodness, being a teenager is hard!
Posted by: gary | December 18, 2008 at 06:33 AM
I'm voting for the middle option. You can't really fight it.
Posted by: blognut | December 18, 2008 at 08:45 AM
I'd go with the middle option. You can't really fight it.
Posted by: blognut | December 18, 2008 at 08:46 AM
Yes, you are heading in the direction that I would go to also. Kudos for sisterly love.
It is a blessing knowing that DB was not the instigator, only the defender.....some consolation maybe?
Posted by: Suzanne | December 18, 2008 at 09:14 AM
Our school also suspends for either starting or defending ones self in a fight. The kids are supposed to get an adult. How is that supposed to happen if it has already escalated to fisticuffs??
Sooo frustrating for you, but I would also go to the middle option.
Posted by: MamaHenClucks | December 18, 2008 at 09:53 AM
I vote middle too; assuming that the suspension shows up on his transcript simply as an unexcused absense.
p.s. How'd the OTHER kid look?
Posted by: Fannie | December 18, 2008 at 10:34 AM
I totally thought you'd go with the last option!
Posted by: Janet | December 18, 2008 at 10:40 AM
So what the school is saying is that the person being hit should not defend himself in any way and should just take the hits?
I'm in the minority here, but I would not have gone with the middle option.
Posted by: Jen on the Edge | December 18, 2008 at 11:46 AM
I would go with the middle option and assume that any college familiar with California public school policy would not be shocked to see a suspension for fighting on the transcripts of a good student. My 15yr old was suspended for a day for defending himself in 7th grade and it annoyed the heck out of me. The fact that the other kid was expelled really didn't make me feel any better.
Posted by: Gina | December 18, 2008 at 12:03 PM
That's the MOST unfair rule. A dear boy I know got suspended for a similar situation--total self defense, but "Rules are Rules" said the Powers that Be.
Glad the sister camped on his side--that does sweeten the pot.
Posted by: Green Girl | December 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM
I'm sorry, Jenn. Life isn't fair.
I know the policies are there for a reason, but sometimes they don't make much sense. When heads have cooled, is there a way to make sure it doesn't hamper college apps?
What could a mom be, but proud of her son for defending himself and proud of her daughter for showing her love.
Kum Ba Ya away.
Posted by: kcinnova | December 18, 2008 at 01:13 PM
siblings are awesome. they are your fiercest protector and loudest supporter.
eventually =)
Posted by: Yo | December 18, 2008 at 01:26 PM
I think you made the right decision. But I might consider writing a letter of protest 'for the record' to the school. Not so much an appeal, but rather a diplomatic "I disagree with this policy" statement (or maybe you'd rather just put it to rest). Gosh, it's tough being a parent or a teenager or a school administrator in today's world!
Posted by: MIME | December 18, 2008 at 02:36 PM
I agree with your decision. I think teaching your kids that these are the rules, it's not always fair, but they need to know life is not always fair.
Posted by: Susan | December 18, 2008 at 04:12 PM
I guess I can see why they'd suspend the one not at fault, it might help the atmosphere of school to settle down for him. But it still seems unfair, especially if it might hurt his record.
Posted by: Memarie Lane | December 18, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Oh, I'm sort of glad it didn't make it into the Christmas letter - tee hee! I know - this is not funny - this is the crap we often have to deal with when our kids go out into an "unfair" and crap filled world. I'm sorry this happened to your son and glad to hear his sister was there for him!
Take care - Kellan
Posted by: Kellan | December 18, 2008 at 06:27 PM
I completely understand why the school has to suspend both parties, but it is difficult to accept that defending oneself should go on their long term record. I wouldn't make a big deal about it, but I would ask that it not be on his record. Especially if they all know it wasn't his fault!
Very sweet reaction from his sister!
Posted by: jenrantsraves | December 18, 2008 at 08:40 PM
Have you seen Changeling yet? She tells her son, "never start a fight but always finish it." Meaning if someone hits you, you hit them back. It actually becomes the theme of the entire movie and honestly, is a beautiful story how sticking up for yourself is very important in life. In your story, your son did the right thing. Buy the teacher the DVD for Christmas.
Posted by: Suzy | December 18, 2008 at 11:33 PM
I would do the same you are doing, but I would talk to the school administration to get to the bottom of more details. I am sure the rule came into play because at some point in time a child defending himself became the agressor during a brawl and they had to come up with a rule to avoid a certain situation from arising again.
Rules can be that way. You should read all the disclaimers on an adoption consent form/parental rights waiver - HOLY COW. And they all came to be because some situation arose and an adoption fell through at one point in time or another because of some silly detail.
Rules suck sometimes, but situational circumstances created them.
I would show my support to my kids regardless and explain rules are rules. This has happened to my kids on the bus- getting in trouble for horseplay when they were dogpiled or pushed into the aisle. I tell them there is usually a way around looking like you are in the middle of it, but sometimes it happens. That is why it is important to make good friend choices. If you are friends with those that are constantly in trouble, it looks like you are a trouble maker too, eventually.
KEEP BELIEVING
Posted by: Angie @ KEEP BELIEVING | December 19, 2008 at 04:00 PM
At least he got an extra day for Christmas break
Posted by: Angela | December 19, 2008 at 04:34 PM
I would have taken the middle option as well BUT here in Canada it would have absolutely no impact on college applications. I'd probably try and get the suspension removed from his record if it is likely to be held against him.
Posted by: Deb D | December 19, 2008 at 06:20 PM
Wow, that is a tough call. I'm not sure what I'd do. But this just goes to show that the world is not black and white!
Posted by: Jason | December 19, 2008 at 11:59 PM
That is tough, Jenn. Thinking of you.
Posted by: JCK | December 20, 2008 at 12:12 AM
I highly recommend the middle option also. Though I strongly discourage group singing of KumBaYa.
Posted by: stephanie (bad mom) | December 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM
Wow this is a tough one. So glad sister stepped out for her brother. Way to go.
Posted by: The Girl Next Door | December 20, 2008 at 11:27 PM
When sibling love and support is shown, it does show that all is right with the world, doesn't it?
Being drug into a fight and then getting punished for it sucks. I can see where doing the middle option would probably be the thing to do, but...a part of me would really want to fight it...defending oneself should NOT be punished...the instigator should...especially if there were witnesses to the fight.
Man...parenting doesn't get any easier, does it? I'm taking notes!!
Posted by: debbie | December 21, 2008 at 10:35 AM